I think Carole James and the NDP are making a mistake when they claim that nothing can be done about the HST for five years, when it comes up for re-negotiation. This stance only encourages the cynical view among voters that this is merely a cover to allow the NDP to keep the HST if they formed government
Instead, the NDP should take the stand that the solution to the HST is a political, not a legislative, one because, if the provincial Government pointed out to Prime Minister Harper that he stands to lose all 22 Conservative seats in B.C. over the issue in the next federal election, he might be open to terminating the present agreement. This is not an idle threat; if Harper refused to bow to the will of the citizens of B.C. he would indeed pay dearly for it at the polls.
The NDP should consider putting forward an alternative form of the PST--making it a value-added tax, like the GST, except that it would not be applied to services. If services are not taxed, restaurants, hair salons, notary publics and other service-based businesses would once more be exempt from taxation as they were under the old PST, while all businesses would benefit from rebates on the business-related PST they pay, just like the ones they presently receive under the HST.
For years, the NDP has been so afraid of the epithet 'tax and spend' that the party has failed to engage openly and honestly with citizens about the principles underlying the NDP's approach to taxation. The NDP should embrace the phrase, and every time someone tries to use it against them, the party should boldly assert, "Yes, like any government, we will tax and spend--unlike the Liberals, we will tax fairly and spend wisely."
Economists approve of consumption taxes instead of income taxes on the theory that the less income is taxed the more is available for savings to be invested in the economy. However, there is no guarantee that such savings will be invested in the Canadian economy.
The higher one's income, the more one benefits from the shift to consumption taxes which is one reason, I believe, why the rich continue to grow richer and middle income earners, poorer (the lowest incomes are somewhat protected by tax rebates). Middle income earners, while they may benefit somewhat from lower income taxes, still, when consumption taxes are imposed instead, do not have as much money left over after the necessities of life are provided for as do those on higher incomes and this gap widens every time income taxes are cut and consumption taxes imposed instead.
The NDP should start a conversation with the citizens of B.C. on all aspects of taxation, especially the relative benefits and down-sides of income and consumption taxes, and what combination of the two would be the fairest and most effective for all taxpayers.
Monday, August 30, 2010
Saturday, August 7, 2010
Minister Tony Clement is no hero
The following letter to a local radio station relates to a recent news story in which Tony Clement, Minister of Industry was treated by the media as if he'd actually rescued a swimmer in distress, when he'd done no such thing.
"What is this nonsense that Tony Clement is a hero? He didn't rescue anyone. Instead, he put himself in danger by diving into the river, fully dressed, without plan or forethought, and he's lucky he didn't have to be rescued himself. Clement's wife and father-in-law were the ones with the foresight to grab a life-jacket, and run down the river to intercept the swimmer. But this point is not given the prominence it deserves; instead the coverage focused on Clement's totally useless act.
"Clement's plunge into the river is on a par with his other plunge into stupidity--the replacement of the mandatory long form of the census with a totally useless voluntary form. Both are acts taken without an intelligent assessment of the situation. On the river, Clement only put himself in danger; with regard to the census, he endangers sensible public policies at all levels by degrading the quality of the information that organizations of all kinds, public and private, will have to work with in future."
"What is this nonsense that Tony Clement is a hero? He didn't rescue anyone. Instead, he put himself in danger by diving into the river, fully dressed, without plan or forethought, and he's lucky he didn't have to be rescued himself. Clement's wife and father-in-law were the ones with the foresight to grab a life-jacket, and run down the river to intercept the swimmer. But this point is not given the prominence it deserves; instead the coverage focused on Clement's totally useless act.
"Clement's plunge into the river is on a par with his other plunge into stupidity--the replacement of the mandatory long form of the census with a totally useless voluntary form. Both are acts taken without an intelligent assessment of the situation. On the river, Clement only put himself in danger; with regard to the census, he endangers sensible public policies at all levels by degrading the quality of the information that organizations of all kinds, public and private, will have to work with in future."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)